Acceptance of the temporal norm has taken a form which, having passed
through a long series of historical transformations, through civilizing and
uncivilizing waves, and still in constant flux, is typical of the contemporary
world: it has become continuous, uniform, almost without moments of high
intensity but very demanding and pervasive. Above all, it has somehow hidden
itself from the individual conscience and become perceived subjectively as a
personal psychological inclination. [Norbert] Elias notes that those who declare themselves incapable of breaking the rules of punctuality have the impression that they are describing a personal idiosyncrasy rather than admitting the extent to
which they have completely internalized a social habitus concerning coordination of times. ‘The time experience of people who belong to firmly time-regulated societies is one of many examples of personality structure which are
compelling as biological characteristics, yet socially acquired’ (Elias, 1992:
141). This habitus of worrying about efficiency and punctuality has grown over
a long period of history along with other sensitivities and rejections which, put
together, are the result of what Elias has analysed as the ‘civilizing process’.
In the contemporary world, external temporal restraint transforms itself into
self-restraint, an all-pervading acute sensibility to all aspects of the temporal
regulation of life.
Simonetta Tabboni
Sem comentários:
Enviar um comentário